Breast (female), colorectal, and lung cancer survival in people with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Cancer is a leading cause of death among people living with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD). There is little empirical evidence documenting survival or comparing outcomes to those without IDD. This study investigated the association between IDD and cancer survival among adults with breast (female), colorectal, or lung cancer. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted in Ontario, Canada, with routinely collected data. Patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer were included (2007‒2019). IDD status before cancer was determined using an established administrative data algorithm. The outcomes of interest included death from any cause and death from cancer. Cox proportional hazards models and competing events analyses using multivariable cause-specific hazards regression were completed. Analyses were stratified by cancer type. Interactions with age, sex, and stage at diagnosis, as well as sensitivity analyses, were completed. RESULTS: The final cohorts included 123,695 breast, 98,809 colorectal, and 116,232 lung cancer patients. Individuals with IDD experienced significantly worse survival than those without IDD. The adjusted hazard ratios of all-cause death were 2.74 (95% CI 2.41‒3.12), 2.42 (95% CI 2.18‒2.68), and 1.49 (95% CI 1.34‒1.66) times higher for breast, colorectal, and lung cancer patients with IDD relative to those without. These findings were consistent for cancer-specific deaths. With few exceptions, worse survival for people with IDD persisted regardless of stage at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: People with IDD experienced worse cancer survival than those without IDD. Identifying and intervening on the factors and structures responsible for survival disparities is imperative.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Le cancer est l'une des principales causes de mortalité chez les personnes vivant avec des déficiences intellectuelles ou des troubles du développement (DI/TD). Il y a peu de preuves empiriques décrivant la survie de ces personnes lorsqu'elles sont atteintes d'un cancer ou comparant leurs résultats à ceux des personnes sans DI/TD. Notre étude porte sur l'association entre les DI/TD et la survie au cancer chez les adultes atteints de cancer du sein (femmes), du colorectum ou du poumon. MéTHODE: Une étude de cohorte rétrospective populationnelle a été menée en Ontario, au Canada, à l'aide de données recueillies systématiquement. Nous avons inclus les patientes et les patients atteints de cancer du sein, du colorectum ou du poumon (2007‒2019). Nous avons identifié la présence des DI/TD avant le cancer à l'aide d'un algorithme de traitement de données administratives reconnu. Les résultats d'intérêt étaient les décès de toutes causes et les décès dus au cancer. Nous avons appliqué des modèles des risques proportionnels de Cox et des analyses des événements concurrents en utilisant la régression multivariée des risques par cause. Nos analyses ont été stratifiées selon le type de cancer. Nous avons tenu compte des interactions avec l'âge, le sexe et le stade au diagnostic et effectué des analyses de sensibilité. RéSULTATS: Les cohortes finales ont inclus 123 695 personnes atteintes de cancer du sein, 98 809 atteintes de cancer colorectal et 116 232 atteintes de cancer du poumon. La survie des sujets ayant des DI/TD a été significativement moins bonne que celle des sujets sans DI/TD. Les rapports de risques instantanés ajustés pour les décès de toutes causes étaient 2,74 fois (IC de 95 % 2,41‒3,12), 2,42 fois (IC de 95 % 2,18‒2,68) et 1,49 fois (IC de 95 % 1,34‒1,66) plus élevés chez les personnes atteintes de cancer du sein, du colorectum et du poumon et ayant des DI/TD que chez les personnes sans DI/TD. Ces constatations ressortent pour tous les décès attribuables à des cancers particuliers. Avec peu d'exceptions, la survie moins bonne pour les personnes ayant des DI/TD persistait quel que soit le stade au moment du diagnostic. CONCLUSION: La survie au cancer était moins bonne chez les personnes ayant des DI/TD que chez celles n'ayant pas de DI/TD. Il est impératif d'identifier les facteurs et les structures responsables de ces disparités dans la survie et d'intervenir en conséquence.

Investigating inequalities in cancer staging and survival for adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities and cancer: A population-based study in Manitoba, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a leading cause of death among adults living with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD). However, few epidemiological studies exist worldwide quantifying inequalities in cancer stage at diagnosis and survival for people with IDD relative to those without IDD. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted using provincial health and social administrative data in Manitoba, Canada. Adults (≥18 years) with a cancer diagnosis between 2004 and 2017 were included. Lifetime IDD was identified before the cancer diagnosis using an established algorithm. Modified Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to estimate the association between IDD status and metastatic cancer at diagnosis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to the effect of IDD on overall survival following the cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: The staging and prognosis cohorts included 62,886 (n = 473 with IDD) and 74,143 (n = 592 with IDD) cancer patients, respectively. People living with IDD were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic cancer and die following their cancer diagnosis compared to those without IDD (RR=1.20; 95 % CI 1.05-1.38; HR= 1.53; 95 % CI 1.38-1.71). Significant heterogeneity by sex was identified for cancer survival (p = 0.005). DISCUSSION: People with IDD had more advanced cancer stage at diagnosis and worse survival relative to those without IDD. Identifying and developing strategies to address the factors responsible that contribute to these disparities is required for improving patient-centred cancer care for adults with IDD.

Stage IV breast, colorectal, and lung cancer at diagnosis in adults living with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A population-based cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a leading cause of death among people living with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD). Although studies have documented lower cancer screening rates, there is limited epidemiological evidence quantifying potential diagnostic delays. This study explores the risk of metastatic cancer stage for people with IDD compared to those without IDD among breast (female), colorectal, and lung cancer patients in Canada. METHODS: Separate population-based cross-sectional studies were conducted in Ontario and Manitoba by linking routinely collected data. Breast (female), colorectal, and lung cancer patients were included (Manitoba: 2004-2017; Ontario: 2007-2019). IDD status was identified using established administrative algorithms. Modified Poisson regression with robust error variance models estimated associations between IDD status and the likelihood of being diagnosed with metastatic cancer. Adjusted relative risks were pooled between provinces using random-effects meta-analyses. Potential effect modification was considered. RESULTS: The final cohorts included 115,456, 89,815, and 101,811 breast (female), colorectal, and lung cancer patients, respectively. Breast (female) and colorectal cancer patients with IDD were 1.60 and 1.44 times more likely to have metastatic cancer (stage IV) at diagnosis compared to those without IDD (relative risk [RR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.20; RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.24-1.67). This increased risk was not observed in lung cancer. Significant effect modification was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: People with IDD were more likely to have stage IV breast and colorectal cancer identified at diagnosis compared to those without IDD. Identifying factors and processes contributing to stage disparities such as lower screening rates and developing strategies to address diagnostic delays is critical.

A scoping review documenting cancer outcomes and inequities for adults living with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities.

INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence suggests adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) may be at risk of inequities in cancer experiences and outcomes. Individuals with IDD may experience multiple barriers that could worsen outcomes and experience. These barriers may be connected to features of IDD or the healthcare system overall. Future research and program planning to support adults with IDD and cancer must be informed by evidence that acknowledges potential disparities, underlying determinants, and knowledge deficits. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a scoping review to systematically map the evidence describing and comparing cancer-related outcomes along the cancer continuum from risk to mortality for adults with IDD. We identified specific factors observed to influence those outcomes. METHODS: We followed the expanded Arksey & O'Malley framework for conducting the scoping review. We searched for literature in PubMed and Embase databases. We abstracted cancer-related data, IDD-related data, and data related to physical and social determinants of health. RESULTS: Of the 2796 studies retrieved, 38 were included for review. Most studies focused on screening outcomes and experiences. Studies reported that adults with IDD experienced inequities at various points along the cancer continuum. Numerous social and physical determinants of health influenced the experiences and outcomes of adults with IDD. CONCLUSION: This scoping review identified significant gaps in the literature. Of note was the focus on cancer screening and lack of attention to larger systems of oppression that may influence poor cancer experiences and outcomes for adults with IDD. There is strong need to improve both quality and quantity of research in this area.

Scoping review protocol documenting cancer outcomes and inequalities for adults living with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities.

INTRODUCTION: There is increasing attention on the cancer burden for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Emerging evidence suggests there are differences in cancer experiences and outcomes for individuals living with IDD, from risk through survivorship. These differences may be attributed to features of the IDD, such as cognitive deficits and communication, as well as social determinants of health-like lower education levels and ableism. However, there is no comprehensive overview of the literature quantifying these potential disparities and describing the influencing factors. In this paper, we describe a scoping review protocol to systematically review published literature on cancer for adults with IDD. The purpose of this review is to identify differences in cancer risk, stage at diagnosis, treatment and survival along the cancer continuum for adults with IDD and outline potential contributing factors creating these disparities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow Arksey and O'Malley's expanded framework for scoping reviews to conduct this review. We will systematically search electronic databases for peer-reviewed, published journal articles to identify appropriate studies in collaboration with a health science librarian. Two reviewers will independently review titles and abstracts followed by a full-text review to determine whether it meets inclusion criteria. A data chart for collecting and sorting information will be developed in consultation with the team. Results will be collated and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews: PRISMA-Scoping Reviews. Extracted information will be summarised quantitatively and qualitatively to meet review objectives. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will employ a methodology to identify literature related to cancer outcomes and experiences for adults with IDD. Results will be disseminated to relevant stakeholders who care for and support individuals with IDD at local, provincial and national levels and through publishing findings. By highlighting the disparities in the cancer system and gaps in the research, this scoping review can provide direction for future action.

The prevalence of multimorbidity and associations with lifestyle factors among middle-aged Canadians: an analysis of Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging data.

BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity can be defined as the presence of more than one chronic condition in an individual. Research on multimorbidity has predominantly focused on older adults and few studies have examined multimorbidity in middle-aged people. The objectives of this study were to: 1) examine the prevalence of multimorbidity among middle-aged Canadians; and 2) examine the association between lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity) and multimorbidity in this age group. METHODS: In this analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) baseline data, we extracted data from 29,841 participants aged 45-64 years from a database of 51,338 people aged 45-85 years. Self-reported data on 27 chronic physical health conditions were used to derive different multimorbidity definitions. We estimated the prevalence of 3+ to 5+ chronic physical health conditions in different subgroups for descriptive purposes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between socio-demographic and lifestyle factors, and multimorbidity using a 3+ multimorbidity case definition. RESULT: We found that 39.6% (99% CI 38.4-40.7) of participants had three or more chronic conditions with a mean number of chronic condition of 2.41 (99% CI 2.37-2.46). The prevalence of multimorbidity increased with age from 29.7% in the 45-49-year-old age group to 52% in individuals aged 60-64 years. The prevalence of 4+ and 5+ chronic conditions was 24.5 and 14.2% respectively. Analyses indicated that female sex and low income were associated with higher odds of multimorbidity, whereas daily or weekly alcohol intake were associated with lower odds of multimorbidity. Exercise was not associated with multimorbidity. Results were similar when analyses were conducted separately for women and men. CONCLUSIONS: Multimorbidity is not limited to older adults, but is a common phenomenon among middle-aged people. Longitudinal research is needed to better understand the temporal relationship between lifestyle factors and multimorbidity.

Patterns of mortality among adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Ontario.

OBJECTIVES: To determine recent mortality rates among Ontarian adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and investigate changes over time in contrast to the general population. To determine the most commonly reported underlying causes of death and explore related coding practices. METHODS: Using linked health administrative data, four cohorts of adults with IDD aged 25-99 living in Ontario were followed for 1 year (one cohort for each year between 2011 and 2014). Deaths (2011 to 2014) and causes of death (2011 to 2013) were identified, and age-standardized mortality rates were calculated annually. For 2013, overall and sex-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Mortality ratios were also examined across 5-year age groups. Commonly reported causes of death were tabulated by ICD-10 chapter, differences by sex examined, and cause-specific SMRs calculated. All deaths with IDD diagnostic codes reported as underlying cause of death were identified. RESULTS: Mortality rates among individuals with IDD have been decreasing over time; in 2014, the mortality rate was 22.6 deaths per 1000 person-years. Disparities in mortality rates relative to the general population decreased with increasing age. Men with IDD had higher mortality rates than women with IDD. The most common causes of death among individuals with IDD were cardiovascular disease, neoplasms, and diseases of the respiratory system. An IDD diagnostic code was reported as cause of death in 3.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The ongoing excess mortality among Ontarians with IDD should be closely monitored by policy makers and service providers. Attention to cause of death reporting should be considered so that cause of death can be thoroughly examined.

Smoking during pregnancy: findings from the 2009-2010 Canadian Community Health Survey.

OBJECTIVES: Smoking during pregnancy may cause many health problems for pregnant women and their newborns. However, there is a paucity of research that has examined the predictors of smoking during pregnancy in Canada. This study used data from the 2009-2010 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) to estimate the prevalence of smoking during pregnancy and examine the demographic, socioeconomic, health-related and behavioral determinants of this behavior. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The data were obtained from the 2009-2010 CCHS master data file. Weighted estimates of the prevalence were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine demographic, socioeconomic, health related and behavioral characteristics associated with smoking behavior during pregnancy. Women living in the Northern Territories had a high rate of smoking during pregnancy (59.3%). The prevalence of smoking during pregnancy was also high among women under 25 years old, of low socioeconomic status, who reported not having a regular medical doctor, being fair to poor in self-perceived health, having at least one chronic disease, having at least one mental illness, being heavy smokers, and being regular alcohol drinkers. Results from multivariable logistic regression revealed that the odds of smoking during pregnancy were decreased with increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.99), having a regular family doctor [OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11-0.52], having highest level of family income [OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03-0.29]. Mothers who reported poor or fair self-perceived health [OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.96-4.71] and those who had at least one mental illness [OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.00-3.28] had greater odds of smoking during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of demographic, socio-economic, health-related and behavioral characteristics that should be considered in developing and implementing effective population health promotional strategies to prevent smoking during pregnancy, promoting health and well-being of pregnant women and their newborns.